MÜZE SOSYOLOJİSİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN MÜZE – TOPLUM ETKİLEŞİMİ YORUMLARINA GENEL BİR BAKIŞ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2019-41
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2019-09-24 21:39:57.0
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Sosyoloji
Number of pages: 205-219
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Sayıları giderek artan özel müzeler ve etkinlikleri toplumda farklı bir müze algısına yol açmıştır. Özellikle sanat sosyolojisi bağlamında ele alınan toplum- müze etkileşimi çalışmaları ülkemizde eğitim ve müze ilişkisi ekseninde çalışılsa da müze sosyolojisi henüz Avrupa merkezli çalışılmaktadır. Batı’nın sanat sosyolojisinin merkezinde ele aldığı müzeler etkinlikleri ve toplumla etkileşimleri yönüyle farklılaştıkça toplumsal değişmenin de kapsamı ile kesişen çalışmalar çok disiplinli müze sosyolojisi çalışmalarından oluşan literatürü ortaya çıkarmıştır. Müzenin tanımında zamanla ortaya çıkan farklılaşmalar, sosyologların müzeyi etnoloji ve antropoloji bakış açısı dışında etkileşim mekanı olarak çalışmaları müzeyi bağımsız bir alt disiplinin konusuna dönüştürmüştür. Bu çalışmada müzenin sosyoloji perspektifinden görünümü ve müze sosyolojisine farklı yaklaşımların yorumları ve müze sosyolojisinin alt disiplin olarak boyutları ele alınacaktır.

Keywords

Abstract

The increasing number of private museums and their activities led to a different perception of the museum in the society. Although socio-museum interaction studies, especially in the context of art sociology, are studied in the context of the relationship between education and museum in our country, museum sociology is studied in the Western center. As the museums' activities and interactions with the society differentiated in the center of Western sociology of art differ from the aspect of social change, the studies intersected with the scope of multidisciplinary museum sociology. The differences in the definition of the museum over time, and the work of sociologists as a place of interaction outside the perspective of ethnology and anthropology have turned the museum into an independent sub-discipline. In this study, the view of the museum from the perspective of sociology, interpretations of different approaches to museum sociology and the dimensions of museum sociology as sub-discipline will be discussed.

Keywords


  • Arseven, C. E.(1994). "Müze" Sanat Ansiklopedisi C.3. İstanbul.

  • Artun, A.(2018). Sanatın İktidarı 1917 Devrimi,Avangard Sanat ve Müzecilik, İstanbul,

  • Adorno, T.(1997). Prisms. MIT Press.

  • Ambrose, T. Paine, C.(2005). “Some Definitions of Museum”, (ed). Gaynor Kavanagh. Museum

  • Bennett, T. (1995) The Birth of the Museum. London: Routledge.

  • Bennet. T.(2018). Museums: Power-Knowledge. Routledge.

  • Bourdieu, P. - Darbel, A. - Schnapper, D. (1991) The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their Public, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Boylan, J. P. (1995), “Heritage and Cultural Policy: the Role of Museums”

  • Bruninghaus-Knubel. C.(2004). “Museum Education in the Context of Museum Functions”. Running a Museum: A Practical Handbook, International Council of Museums, Paris.

  • Coombes, A. E.(1991). “Ethnography and the formation of national identities” S. Hiller (ed.), The Myth of Primitivism, London: Routledge, ss. 189–214.

  • Desvallées, André, and François Mairesse, eds. 2010. Key Concepts of Museology. Paris: Armand Colin ve ICOM.

  • Duncan, Carol. - Alan Wallace.(1980). “The Universal Survey Museum”, Art History. Aralık 1980. ss:448-469

  • Erhat, Azra, Mitoloji Sözlüğü, İstanbul 1983, s.208-209.

  • Foucault, M.(1994). “Different spaces”. James Faubion (ed.), Michel Foucault: The Essential Works, vol.2: Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, ss 175–85. London: Allen Lane.

  • Foucault, M. (2016). Bilginin Arkeolojisi. İstanbul. Ayrıntı Yayınları.

  • Fyfe, G. (2006) ‘Sociology and the Social Aspects of Museums’. S. Macdonald (ed.), A

  • Grennhill, E. (2006). “Studiying Visitors: Spects of Museums”. S. Macdonald (ed.). A Companion to Museum Studies, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, ss. 362-376.

  • Halbwachs, M.(1992). On Collective Memory. University Of Cihicago Press.

  • Karpov, Viktor. (2016) “Ukrainian Historiography Of Museum Sociology”. http://journals.uran.ua/visnyknakkkim/article/viewFile/138975/135903 ss:3-8

  • Karadeniz, C.(2018) Müze Kültür Toplum, İstanbul. İmge.

  • Kirchberg, V. (2003) ‘Categorizing urban tasks: Functions of Museums In The Post-Industrial

  • Kirschberg, Volker.(2016). “Museum Sociolgy”, Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology

  • Kotler, N.- Kotler, P. - Kotler, W.(2008). Museum Marketing and Strategy. San Fransisco: Josey Bass.

  • Latham, K. - Simmons, J.(2014). Museum Studies: Evolving Systems of Knowlwdge. California: Libraries Unlimited.

  • Lord, B. (2006) “Foucault’s Museum: Difference, Representation and Genealogy”. Museum and Society. Cilt: 4. Sayı:1 11–14.

  • Luke, T.(2002). Museum Politics. University of Minnesota Press. Mineapolis.

  • Macdonald, S. and G. Fyfe (eds.) (1996) Theorizing Museums. Representing Identity and Diversity in a Changing World, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.

  • Magzumovna, A. N. “The Museum’s History İn The Past And İn The Future” http://old.ehistory.kz/media/upload/5093/2015/09/22/

  • Marstine, J.(2006). New Museum : Theory and Practice. Blackwell Publishing: Londra

  • Marontate, J. (2005) ‘Museums And The Constitution of Culture’, in M.D. Jacobs and N. Weiss

  • Mason, R. (2006) ‘Cultural Theory And Museum Studies’. Sarah. Macdonald (ed.), A Companion to

  • McCall, V. - Grey, Clive.(2013) “Museums And The‘New Museology’: Theory, Practice Andorganisational Change ”, Museum Management and Curatorship, Cilt:29, Sayı:1 . ss:1-17.

  • McLean, F. (2003). Marketing the Museum. Londra. Routledge.

  • MacDonald, S. (1996) ‘Introduction’. S. Macdonald ve G. Fyfe (eds.), Theorizing Museums.

  • Onur, B.(2014) . Yeni Müzebilim , Ankara: İmge.

  • Preziosi, D.(1996). “Brain of the Earth’s Body: Museums and the Framing of Modernity.”. (ed).Paul

  • Prior, Nick.(2006) ‘Postmodern Restructurings’. S. Macdonald (ed.), A Companion to Museum

  • Rhiannon, M. (2006).”Cultural Theory and Museum Studies”. A Companion to Museum Studies, London: Blackwell.s.39.

  • Ritzer, G. (1998) .The McDonaldization Thesis. Londra: Sage.

  • Ritzer, G. (2012) The McDonaldization of Society, California: Sage.

  • Ross, M. (2004) ‘Interpreting the New Museology’, Museum and Society, Temmuz 2004. Cilt:2. Sayı: 2. ss: 84-103.

  • Talboys, G.(2005). Museum Educator’s Handbook. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

  • Trienen, H.(1993). “What Does The Visitor Want From A Museum?”. Museum Studies in the 90s.

  • Uryy, J.(2000). Sociology Beyond Societies. Londra: Routloudge.

  • Vergo, P.(2006). The New Museology. Londra: Reaktion Books.

  • Weil, S.(2002) “From Being About Something to Being For Somebody: The Ongoing Transformation of The American Museum”. (ed). S. Weil. Making Museums Matter. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, ss. 28–52.

  • Zavala, L.(1993). “Towards a Theory of Museum Reception”. Museum Studies in the 90s. (ed). Sandra Bicknell-Graham Farmelo. Londra: Science Museum.

  • Zolberg, V.(1986) ‘Tensions of Mission in American Art Museums”. (ed). P.J. Di Maggio. Nonprofit

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics