TÜRKLER VE KÜRTLER TEMELİNDE TOPLUMSAL ÖNYARGILAR

Author :  

Year-Number: 2020-46
Language : Türkçe
Konu : Siyaset Bilimi, Yönetim Bilimleri, Sosyal Bilimler
Number of pages: 1-19
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Türkiye’de oldukça yoğun geçen siyasi gündemlerin gölgesinde kalan fakat gündelik hayatımızda sıkça karşılaştığımız önyargı sorunu aslında maddi, sosyal ve kültürel koşulların yarattığı bir sorundur. Bu çalışmada toplumsal önyargıların kökenleri ve sebepleri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada toplumsal önyargıların sebep olduğu ötekileştirme, yabancılaştırma gibi sonuçlar üzerinde tartışılmış ve olası çözüm yöntemleri ortaya konmuştur. Gruplararası ilişkilerin yapısı ve öteki kavramının ortaya çıkışına değinilmiştir. Değerler hipotezi, toplumsal temas kuramı gibi bilimsel temelleri baz alınarak Türkiye’de Türk ve Kürtler özelinde önyargıların oluşumu ve etkileri örneklerle incelenmiştir. Araştırmamızda Türkiye'de Türk ve Kürt toplumlarının birbirine karşı önyargıları ve bu önyargıların sebepleri örneklendirilmiş ve bunun üstesinden nasıl gelineceği üzerine tezler ortaya sürülmüştür.

Keywords

Abstract

Under the shadow of the political agenda in Turkey it is quite busy, but everyday problems frequently encountered prejudice in our lives. In this study, the roots and the reasons of social prejudice were examined. Also in this context, in the study, the outcomes of social prejudice such as otherization, alienation were discussed and the possible solutions were presented. The structure of intergroup relations and the emergence of the other concept are mentioned. Value hypothesis, based on scientific foundations, such as social contact theory Turks and Kurds in Turkey were examined with examples formation and effect of bias in private. In our study, the prejudices and the reasons of these predujices amongst Turkish and Kurdish societies of Turkey were exemplificated and thesisses on how to overcome those were presented.

Keywords


  • Abu-Nimer M., (1999) Dialogue, Conflict Resolution and Change: Arab-Jewish Encounters in Israel, State University of New York Press, New York.

  • Allport G., (1954) The Nature of Prejudice, Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA.

  • Allport, G. W. & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.

  • Altemeyer, B. & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113-133.

  • Amir Y., (1969) “Contact Hypothesis in Ethnic Relations,” Psychological Bulletin, 71, s.319- 42.

  • Balaban, Ç. D. (2013) The roles of intergroup threat, social dominance orientation and right- wing authoritarianism in predicting Turks’ prejudice toward Kurds, Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, ODTÜ, Ankara.

  • Bar, H., ve Bargal, D., (1995) “Living with conflict: Encounters between Jewish and Palestinian youth”, The Jerusalem Institute for the Study of Israel (ibranice).

  • Bayad, Aydın, (2015), “Türkiyeli Kürtlerin Etnik Kimlik Statülerinde Yaşanan Farklılaşmanın Değer Aktarım Süreçleriyle Olan İlişkisinin İncelenmesi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.

  • Berry, J. W. (1974). Psychological aspects of cultural pluralism: unity and identity Reconsidered. Topics in Culture Learning, 2, 17-22.

  • Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5- 34.

  • Bilgin, N. (2007). Kimlik inşası. Aşina Kitaplar, İzmir.

  • Boehnke, K. (2001). Parent-Offspring value transmission in a societal context: Suggestions for a utopian research design with empirical underpinnings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2), 241-255.

  • Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., ve Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 135-149.

  • Brewer, M. B. (2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In Ashmore, D., Jussim, L., Wilder, D. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cook, S. W., (1978) “Interpersonal and Attitudinal Outcomes in Cooperating Interracial Groups”, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), s. 97-113.

  • Cuhadar, E. ve B. Dayton, (2011) “The Social Psychology of Identity and Intergroup Conflict: From Theory to Practice”, International Studies Perspectives, Cilt 12, s. 273-293.

  • Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., & Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, social dominance orientation, or right‐wing authoritarianism?. European Journal of Personality, 18(6), 463-482.

  • Ergin, M. (2014). The racialization of Kurdish identity in Turkey. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(2), 322-341.

  • Forbes, H. D., (1997) Ethnic Conflict: Commerce, Culture, and the Contact Hypothesis, Yale University Press, New Haven.

  • Gaertner, L.& Dovidio, J.F. (2005). Categorization, re-categorization, and intergroup bias. In Dovidio, F., Glick, P., Rudman, L. A. (Eds.). On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA:Blackwell Publication.

  • Hayes, C., J. (1995). Milliyetçilik: Bir din. İstanbul, İz Yayıncılık.

  • Hewstone, M. ve R. Brown, (1986) “Contact is not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the ‘Contact Hypothesis”, M. Hewstone ve R. Brown (der.), Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters, Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Hewstone, M. ve Greenland, K., (2000) “Inter-group conflict”, International Journal of Psychology, 35, s. 136-144.

  • Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of Social Identity Theory. Politi-cal Psychology, 22(1), 127-156.

  • Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51.

  • Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C. & Labouff, J. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(2), 119-126.

  • Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psy-chology, 33, 1–27.

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881-919.

  • Jost, J.T., Pelham, B.W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B.N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.

  • Karaoğlu, E. (2015). The role of social dominance orientation, empathy and perceived threat in predicting prejudice of Turkish citizens toward Syrian immigrants. Yayımlanmamış

  • Karaçanta, H. (2002). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyal baskınlık yönelimi ve başka bazı değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.

  • Kocaman, T. ve Bayazıt, S., (1993) Türkiye’de iç göçler ve göç edenlerin sosyo-ekonomik nitelikleri. Ankara: DPT Sosyal Planlama Gen.Md. Yayınları.

  • Kutlay, N. (2012). Kürt kimliğinin oluşum süreci. Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.

  • McDowall, D. (2004). Modern Kürt tarihi (N. Domaniç, Çev.). İstanbul. Doruk Yayınları (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 1997).

  • Napier, J. L. & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?. Psychological Science, 19(6), 565-572.

  • Natali, D. (2009). Kürtler ve devlet: Irak, Türkiye ve İran’da ulusal kimliğin gelişmesi. 1.bs., İstanbul, Avesta Yayınları

  • Pettigrew, T., (1998) “Intergroup Contact Theory”, Annual Review of Psychology, 49, s.65-85.

  • Reicher, S., (1986) “Contact, Action and Racialization: Some British Evidence”, Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters, M. Hewstone and R. Brown, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Reijerse, A., Van Acker, K., Vanbeselaere, N., Phalet, K., & Duriez, B. (2013). Beyond the ethnic-civic dichotomy: cultural citizenship as a new way of excluding immigrants. Political Psychology, 34 (4), 611-630.

  • Rubin, M. & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823

  • Rumbaut, R. G. (2008). Reaping what you sow: immigration, youth, and reactive ethnicity. Applied Development Science, 12(2), 108-111

  • Saroglou, V., Corneille, O. & Van Cappelen, P. (2009). Speak, Lord, your servant is listening: religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19(3), 143-154.

  • Schiefer, D., Möllering, A., Daniel, E., & Benish-Weisman, M. (2010). Cultural values and outgroup negativity: A cross-cultural comparison of early and late adolescents. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 635-651.

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (2001). Value hierarchies across cultures: taking a similarities perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 268-290.

  • Schwartz, S.H., Caprara, G.V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psycho-logy, 31(3), 421-452.

  • Sezgin, D., & Wall, M. A. (2005). Constructing the Kurds in the Turkish press: a case study of Hürriyet newspaper. Media, Culture & Society, 27(5), 787-798.

  • Sherif, M., (1966) In Common Predicament: Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

  • Sibley, C. G., Robertson, A., & Wilson, M. S. (2006). Social dominance orientation and right- wing authoritarianism: additive and interactive effects. Political Psychology, 27, 755–

  • Sibley, C. G., Wilson, M. S., & Duckitt, J. (2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160-172.

  • Sidanius, J., Liu, J. H., Shaw, J. S. and Pratto, F. (1994), Social dominance orientation,hierarchy attenuators and hierarchy enhancers: Social Dominance Theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Simon, B., Aufderheide, B., ve Kampmeier, C. (2001). The social psychology of minority- majority relations. In R., Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes. 303-323. Berlin: Blackwell.

  • Spilka, B. (1986). The meaning of personal faith: a con-tinuing research odyssey. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 5, 85–90.

  • Stoop, Chrizell, (2017). Children's rights to mother-tongue education in a multilingual world: a comparative analysis between South Africa and Germany, University of South Africa.

  • Tajfel, H. E. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.) Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago:NelsonHall.

  • Turner, J. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: a self categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Whitley, B. J. ve Bernard, E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126 –134.

  • Yilmaz, O. & Saribay, S. A. (2016). An attempt to clarify the link between cognitive style and political ideology: A non-western replication and extension. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(3), 287-300.

  • Yüceşahin, M., M. & Özgür, E. M. (2006). Türkiye’nin güneydoğusunda nüfusun zorunlu yerinden oluşu: Süreçler ve mekânsal örüntü. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 15-35.

  • Yükseler. D. (2006) Yurtlarından ve yaşamlarından koparılmış insanlar: Bir sosyal dışlanma sureci olarak Türkiye’de Kürtlerin yerlerinden edilmesi. Türkiye’de büyük kentlerin gecekondu ve çöküntü mahallelerinde yaşanan yoksulluk ve sosyal dışlanma. (içinde sf. 40-53). http://ec.europa.eu/ employment_social/social_inclusion/docs/2006/study_turkey_tr.pdf.

  • Zeyneloglu, S., Civelek, H. ve Y. Coşkun, Y. (2011). Kürt sorununda antropolojik ve demografik boyut: Sayım ve araştırma verilerinden elde edilen bulgular. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 335-384.

  • Zürcher, E., J. (2005). İmparatorluktan cumhuriyete Türkiye’de etnik çatışma. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics