Author :
Abstract
Bu araştırmanın amacı, Robinson’a (1999) ait işkoliklik riski testi (WART) ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlamasını sağlamaktır. Ölçeğin Türkçeye çevrilmesinde Brislin’in (1970) aşamaları izlenmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde SPSS ve AMOS programları kullanılmıştır. Veri toplama aşamasında, 25 maddeden oluşan ölçek, iki çalışma grubuna uygulanmıştır. İlk çalışma grubu 206 akademisyenden oluşurken ikinci grup 281 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. İlk çalışma grubuna, keşfedici faktör analizi uygulanarak geçerli bir yapı oluşturulmaya çalışılmıştır. İkinci çalışma grubuna uygulanan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sayesinde keşfedici faktör analizi ile elde edilen yapı geçerliği doğrulanmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliği Cronbach’s Alfa katsayısı ile hesaplanmıştır. Hem ölçeğin hem de alt boyutlarının yeterli güvenirlik katsayılarına sahip olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Literatürde oldukça yaygın kullanılan WART ölçeğinin ulusal literatüre kazandırılması amacıyla yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları sonucunda, 18 madde ve 4 boyuttan oluşan “işkoliklik riski testi” ölçeğinin Türkiye’de işkoliklik riskini test etmek için kullanılabilir bir ölçek olduğu bulgulanmıştır.
Keywords
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to adapt the Workaholism Risk Test (WART) scale of Robinson (1999) to Turkish. The stages of Brislin (1970) were followed in the translation of the scale into Turkish. SPSS and AMOS programs were used in the analysis of the obtained data. During the data collection phase, the scale consisting of 25 items was applied to two samples. The first sample consisted of 206 academicians, while the second sample consisted of 281 students. A valid structure was tried to be formed by applying exploratory factor analysis to the first sample. The construct validity obtained by exploratory factor analysis was verified with the confirmatory factor analysis applied to the second sample. Reliability of the scale was calculated with Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. It was found that both the scale and its sub-dimensions had sufficient reliability coefficients. As a result of the validity and reliability studies conducted to introduce to the national literature the WART scale, which is widely used in the literature, it was found that the "Workaholism Risk Test" consisting of 18 items and 4 dimensions was a scale that could be used to test the risk of workaholism in Turkey.
Keywords
- Andreassen, C. S. (2014). Workaholism: An Overview and Current Status of The Research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(1), 1-11.
- Aziz, S., Uhrich, B., Wuensch, K. L. ve Swords, B. (2013). The Workaholism Analysis Questionnaire: Emphasizing work-life imbalance and addiction in the measurement of workaholism. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(2), 71.
- Brady, Becca R; Vodanovich, Stephen J; Rotunda, Robert.The Psychologist-Manager Journal Vol. 11, Iss. 2, (Jul 2008): 241-263. DOI:10.1080/10887150802371781
- Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216
- Burke, R. J. (1999). Workaholism in organizations: Gender Differences. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research [Electronic version], 41, 331-341
- Burke, R.J. (2001), Workaholism in Organizations: The Role of Organizational Values, Personnel Review, 30 (6), 637-645.
- Clark, M.A., Michel, J.S., Zhdanova, L. Pui, S.Y. ve Baltes, B.B. All Work And No Play? A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Correlates and Outcomes of Workaholism. J. Manag. 2016, 42, 1836–1873.
- Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS Ve LISREL Uygulamaları, 2. Baskı, Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, Ankara
- Doğan, T., Tel, F. D. (2011). Duwas İşkoliklik Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun (DUWASTR) Geçerlik ve Güvenirliğinin İncelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 61-69.
- Dutheil, F., Charkhabi, M., Ravoux, H., Brousse, G., Dewavrin, S., Cornet, T., .Pereira, B. (2020). Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-Related Outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 7594.
- Erkuş A (2003), Psikometri Üzerine Yazılar. Türk Psikologlar Derneği, Ankara. No:24. Ersoy-Kart, M. (2005). Reliability and validity of the Workaholism Battery (Work-BAT): Turkish Form. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(6), 609– 618. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.6.609
- Fan, X.,Thompson, B., ve Wang, L. (1999), Effects of Sample Size, EstimationMethods, and Model Specification on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indexes,Structural Equation Modeling: 6 (1), 56-83.
- Filiz, B., Demirhan, G. (2016) Gençlik Deneyimleri Ölçeği (Gdö) 3.1’in Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 75-91.
- Flowers, C. P., Robinson, C. (2002). A Structural and Discriminant Analysis of The Work Addiction Risk Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 517-526.
- Griffiths, M. (2005). Workaholism İs Still A Useful Construct. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(2), 97-100.
- Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Workaholism: A 21st Century Addiction. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 24, 740–744.
- Gürbüz,S. (2019). AMOS İle Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. (1. Baskı) Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Gürbüz, S., Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. (5. Baskı) Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition PrenticeHall.
- Hooper, D.,Coughlan, J. ve Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Researchmethods: 6(1), 53-60. 96.
- Hu, L.T. And Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off Criteria for Fit Indexes İncovariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteriaversus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: 6 (1), 1-55.
- Kılıç, A. F., Koyuncu, İ. (2017). Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışmalarının Yapı Geçerliği Açısından İncelenmesi. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 415-438.
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. (Second Edition). New York: Theguilfordpress.
- Korn, E. R., Pratt, G. J.,ve Lambrou, P. T. (1987). Hyper-Performance: The A.I.M. Strategy for Releasing Your Business Potential. New York: John Wiley.
- Kurt, A.A. (2013). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını
- Mcmillan, L. H. W., O’Driscoll, M. P. ve Burke, R. J. (2003). Workaholism: A Review of Theory, Research, and Future Directions. In Cooper, C. L. Robertson, I. T. (Eds.), International Review of İndustrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 18 (Pp. 167– 189). New York: Wiley.
- Mosier, S. K. (1983), Workaholics: an Analysis of Their Stress, Success and Priorities, Unpublished Master Thesis, Austin: University Of Texas.
- Naughton, T. J. (1987). A Conceptual View of Workaholism and İmplications for Career Counseling and Research. The Career Development Quarterly, 180-187.
- Ng, T.W.H., Sorensen, K.L. ve Feldman, D.C. (2007), Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences of Workaholism: A Conceptual İntegration And Extension, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 28, Pp. 111-136.
- Oates, W.E. (1968). On Being A Workaholic (A Serious Jest). Pastoral Psychology, 19, 16-20.
- Orcan, F. (2018). Açımlayıcı ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi: İlk Hangisi Kullanılmalı? Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 9(4), 414-421
- Porter, G. (1996). Organizational İmpact Of Workaholism: Suggestions for Researching The Negative Outcomes of Excessive Work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 70–84.
- Ravoux, H., Pereira, B., Brousse, G., Dewavrin, S., Cornet, T., Mermillod, M. ve Dutheil, F. (2018). Work Addiction Test Questionnaire to Assess Workaholism: Validation of French Version. JMIR Mental Health, 5(1), E12.
- Robinson BE, Post P, ve Khakee JF. (1992). Test-Retest Reliability of The Work Addiction Risk Test. Percept Mot Skills, 74(3 Pt 1):926.
- Robinson BE. (1996). Concurrent Validity Of The Work Addiction Risk Test As A Measure of Workaholism. Psychol Rep;79(3 Pt 2):1313-1314. [Doi: 10.2466/Pr0.1996.79.3f.1313]
- Robinson, B. E. (2013). Chained to The Desk: A Guidebook for Workaholics, Their Partners and Children, and The Clinicians Who Treat Them (3rd Edn.). New York: New York University Press.
- Robinson, B.E. (1998), Chained to the Desk: A Guidebook for Workaholics, Their Partners and Children, and The Clinicians Who Treat Them. New York University Press, New York, NY.
- Robinson, B.E. (1999), The Work Addiction Risk Test: Development of A Tentative Measure of Workaholism.Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 88, Pp. 199-210.
- Robinson, B.E. (2001), Workaholism and Family Functioning: A Profile of Familial Relationships, Psychological Outcomes, and Research Considerations, Conteporary Family Therapy, vol. 23, Pp. 123-135.
- Robinson, B.E. ve Post, P. (1994), Validity of The Work Addiction Risk Test.Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 78, Pp. 337-338.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., Van Der Heijden, F. M. M. A. ve Prins, J. T. (2009). Workaholism, Burnout, And Well-Being Among Junior Doctors: The Mediating Role Of Role Conflict. Work Stress, 23(2), 155–172.
- Scherer, R. F.,Wiebe F. A., Luther, D. C. ve Adams J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of Coping: Factorstabilityusingtheways Of Copingquestionnaire. Psychological, Reports, 62, 763770.
- Scott, K.S., Moore, K.S. ve Miceli, M.P. (1997), An Exploration of the Meaning and Consequences Of Workaholism.Human Relations, Vol. 50, Pp. 287-314.
- Spence, J.T. And Robbins, A.S. (1992), Workaholism: Definition, Measurement, and Preliminaryresults.Journal Of Personality Assessment, Vol. 58 No. 1, Pp. 160-78
- Steiger, J.H. (1990), Structural Model Evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research:25, 214-12
- Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B. ve Verhoeven, L. C. (2005). Workaholism İn the Netherlands: Measurement and İmplications for Job Strain and Work–Nonwork Conflict. Applied Psychology, 54(1), 37-60.
- Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Faktör Analizi ve Geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizlerinin Kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
