ÖZEL GEREKSİNİMLİ ÇOCUK GÖZÜYLE KAYNAŞTIRMA UYGULAMALARI: FENOMENOLOJİK BİR ÇALIŞMA

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-53
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2021-08-17 15:24:33.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : Çocuk Gelişimi
Number of pages: 407-430
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu araştırma, özel gereksinimli çocuklar için kaynaştırma öğrencisi olmanın ne anlama geldiğini araştırmak ve konuya ışık tutmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden fenomenolojik desen kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubu Ankara’da ilkokula ve ortaokula devam eden özgül öğrenme güçlüğü tanılı kaynaştırma öğrencilerinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Yazılı dokümanlar haline getirilen görüşmeler, MaxQDA programında sırasıyla açık kodlama, eksen kodlaması ve seçici kodlama olmak üzere üç aşamada kodlanmıştır. Kodlamalar sonucunda iletişim, sosyal çevre, akademik alan ve akran zorbalığı olmak üzere dört ana tema oluşturulmuştur. Kaynaştırma öğrencisi iletişim boyutunda “iletişime ket vuran –engel-”; sosyal çevre boyutunda “reddedilmek” ve akademik boyutta “farklı olmak” anlamına gelmektedir. Tüm sonuçlar birlikte değerlendirildiğinde özel gereksinimli çocuk gözünden kaynaştırma öğrencisi olmak ne anlama geliyor soruna “ait olmamak” cevabını vermek mümkündür.

Keywords

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the implications of the experience of integration for children with special needs. The study was conducted using the qualitative research method of phenomenology. The study group comprised integration students with specific learning disability, currently attending primary and secondary school in Ankara. A semi-structured interview form was used within the scope of the research. The interviews, which were turned into written documents, were coded in the MaxQDA program in three stages as open coding, axis coding and selective coding, respectively. Then, four main themes were formed: communication, social environment, academic field and peer bullying. Being a student of mainstreaming is a “obstacle” that disrupts communication in the communication field; it means "rejection" in the social environment field and "being different" in the academic field. When all the results are evaluated together, it can be said that being a mainstreaming student means "not belonging".

Keywords


  • Akalın, S. & Sucuoğlu, N.B. (2010). An investigation of the behaviors of the teachers and the students with and without disabilities in inclusive classrooms. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 5(4), 1710-1729.

  • Altun, T. & Uzuner, F. G. (2016). Views of primary school teachers about education of students with specific learning difficulties. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 44(Nisan), 33–49.

  • Ayral, M., Özcan, Ş., Can, R., Ünlü, A., Bedel, H., Şengün, G., Demirhan, Ş. & Çağlar, K. (2015). The factors that affect the views of normally developing students on mainstream students. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 15(Special Issue), 218-230.

  • Balcı, E. (2019). Teachers' opinions about dyslexia and the challenges they face. Ege Journal of Education, 20(1), 162–179. doi: 10.12984/egeefd.453922

  • Batu, E. S., Cüre, G., Nar, S., Güvercin, D. & Keskin, M. (2018). A review of mainstreaming/inclusion research in elementary and secondary schools in Turkey (20062016). Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, (19), 1-38.

  • Beckett, A. E. (2014). Non-disabled children’s ideas about disability and disabled people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(6), 856-875.

  • Bender, W. N. (2008). Learning disabilities: Characteristics, identification, and teaching strategies. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

  • Birol, Z. N. & Aksoy-Zor, E. (2018). The views of the primary school teachers regarding the problems they have with the students who have been diagnosed with special learning difficulties. GUJGEF, 38(3), 887–918. doi:10.17152/gefad.400054

  • Can, E & Kara, Z. (2017). Examining the factors that affect classroom teacher’s attitudes towards the mainstreamed students. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 19 (2), 71-96.

  • Circular on Education Practices Through Inclusion / Integration, (2017, August 19). Official Newspaper (Number: 10096465), Retrieved from https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_09/21112929_kaynastirma_genelge.pdf

  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Ed. Inc.

  • Çetrez-İşcan, G., Fazlıoğlu, Y. & Parlak, C. (2015). The attitudes of typically developing primary school students’ towards their retarded peers. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 15 (Special Issue), 128-138.

  • Çimen, A. (2019). Evaluation of articulation and Stroop TBAG Form Test results on elemantary school children with specific learning disability [Master Thesis]. Yıldırım Beyazıt University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.

  • Çoğaltay, N. & Çetin, İ. (2020). The classroom teachers’ competencies regarding to special learning disabilities: A qualitative research. Academia Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 126–140.

  • Çuhadar, S. (2017). Teachers’ views regarding educational assessment procedures. Trakya University Journal of Education, 7(2), 526–549. doi: 10.24315/trkefd.307946

  • Demirbilek, M. & Levent, F. (2020). The opinions of school counselors on teacher behaviors towards students with special needs inclusive classrooms. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 479-511.

  • Deniz, S. (2019). The effectiveness of the teacher qualification training program developed for teachers working with students with special learning difficulties [Doctoral Thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya.

  • Dikici Sığırtmaç, A. & Deretarla Gül, E. (2014). Special Education in Preschool. Ankara: Vize Publication.

  • Engin, A. O., Tösten, R., Kaya, M. D. & Köselioğlu, Y. S. (2014). The evaluation of manners and point of views related to mainstreaming education having responsibilities of students who are in needs of special education for primary education (Example of Kars). Kafkas University Journal of the Institute of Social Sciences, 13, 27-44.

  • Fırat, T. & Koçak, D. (2018). Investigating the opinions of class teachers’ on the concept of learning difficulty. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 915–931.

  • Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Gander, M. J. & Gardiner, H. W. (2004). Child and Adolescent Development (Translator: B. Onur, N. Çelen, A. Dönmez). Ankara: İmge Bookstore Publications.

  • Girli, A. & Atasoy, S. (2012). The views of students with intellectual disabilities or autism regarding their school experience and their peers in inclusion. Buca Faculty of Education Journal, 32, 16-30.

  • Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business, and market researchers. London, UK: Sage.

  • Gök, G. & Erbaş, D. (2014). Preschool education teachers' opinions and suggestions on inclusive education. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 3(1), 66-87. doi: 10.20489/intjecse.107947

  • Göktaş, İ. & Gülay-Ogelman, H. G. (2019). Examining the predictor effect of the teacher- student relationships on school adjustment levels of students in preschool education. International Anatolia Academic Online Journal, 5(1), 30-42.

  • Gül, H., Yürümez, E., Gül, A., Kılıç, H. T. & Günay-Ay, M. (2016). The misinterpretations and stigmatization of teachers on specific learning disorders: A multi-center study. Ortadoğu Medical Journal, 8(2), 76-82.

  • Gül, S. O. & Vuran, S. (2015). Children with special needs' opinions and problems about inclusive practices. Education and Science, 40(180), 169-195.

  • Gümüş, M. & Tan, Ç. (2015). An investigation of primary and middle school students' attitude toward inclusive students. Siirt University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 3, 79-94.

  • Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigation. New York, NY: Humanities Press.

  • İçyüz, R. (2016). Determining the problems and needs of parents who continue to integrate the child with hearing loss [Master Thesis]. Anadolu University, Eskişehir.

  • Karadağ, F., Yıldız Demirtaş, V. & Girli, A. (2014). Preferences of preschool children towards peers with disabilities. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(31), 191-215.

  • Karakoç, K. (2020). Assessment of suprathresold auditory processing skills in children with specific learning disorder [Master Thesis]. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ankara.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The constructivist credo. California, CA: Left Coast Press.

  • Melekoğlu, M. A. (2014). Special education today in Turkey. A. F. Rotatori, J. P. Bakken, S. Burkhardt, F. E. Obiakor & U. Sharma (Ed.). Special education international perspectives: Practices across the globe (sf. 529-557). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.

  • Metin, N. (2018). Teacher in an integration preschool classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 2(2), 428-439.

  • MoNE (2018). Special education services regulation. Official Newspaper, (30471), 7 July 2018. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/07/20180707-8.htm

  • Pemik, K. & Deniz, L. (2017). Inclusion students’ perceptions toward their school environments. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 5(41), 76-89.

  • Santrock, J. W. (2011). Life-span development: Developmental psychology (Translator: Yüksel, G.). Ankara: Nobel Academic Publication.

  • Sarı, H. & Pürsün, T. (2019). Examining peer bullying in inclusive classrooms from the perspectives of teachers and students. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 19(44), 731-768.

  • Sever, M., Fulya Soğuksu, A., Türe, E., Koçmar, Y., Olğ Un, M., Üçüncü, N., & Öztürk, İ. (2016). What does it mean to be a student in different types of high schools in turkey through the eyes of students? Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(1), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0157

  • Sivrikaya, T. & Yıkmış, A. (2016). The instructional process requirements of special education graduate and non-graduate teachers working in special education classes. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 16(4), 1984–2001.

  • Tavşanlı, Ö. F., Birgül, K. & Oksal, A. (2016). Analysing the variables that predict secondary school pupils’ perceptions of the school climate. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(9), 8 21838. doi:10.7827/TurkishStudies.9616

  • Tık-Yakar, F. A. (2015). The anxiety level of families with normally developing children in inclusive classes [Master thesis]. Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.

  • Ulugöl, F. & Erbaş, E. (2020). School Transitions of students with special needs: challenges and recommendations. Trakya University Journal of Education, 10(2), 444-459.

  • Yatgın, S., Sevgi, H. M. & Uysal, S. (2015). Classroom teachers’ opinions on inclusive

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics