Author :
Abstract
Günümüzde en çok kullanılan kelimelerden biri, küreselleşme, her bireyin günlük yaşam aktivitelerinde olduğu gibi, dünya sisteminin neredeyse tüm alanlarında deneyimlenen, geçici bir anlayıştır. Dünyanın her yerinde birçok araştırmacı küreselleşme hakkında farklı açıklamaları ve görüş sunuyor ve bu çalışmada bu olayın getirdiği karmaşıklığı açıklamak için bazıları dikkate alınacak. Küreselleşme ile ilgili farklı yaklaşımlar bulunmaktadır, bunlar kimi zaman olumlu, kimi zaman olumsuz diğer taraftan da şüpheli yaklaşımlar; ancak ilginç olan, tüm bu bakış açılarının aynı konulara nasıl odaklandığıdır. Bu süreçle ilgili temel soru küreselleşmenin varlığıyla ilgilidir ve eğer bu yeni bir düzen ise, yalnızca bir efsane mi yoksa olması gereken bir süreç mi? Bu yazarların ortak amacı, bu olayların anlaşılması ve tanımının, beraberinde getirdiği önemli etkileri ve değişiklikleri göstererek çözmektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, küreselleşmenin hayli fazla temas ettiği alanlara geniş bir bakış açısı kazandırmak ve ulus-devletin rolünü analiz ederek durumun ekonomik, sosyo-teknolojik, kültürel ve politik boyutuna odaklanmaktır, ki küreselleşme teorisinde en çok tartışılan konulardan biri ve özellikle içinde bulunduğumuz çağda ulus devletin işlevsel olup olmadığıdır.
Keywords
Abstract
Nowadays one of the most used words is globalization, a fleeting conception experienced in almost all the fields of the world system, so as in the daily life actions of every individual. Several scholars all over the world give different explications and perspectives about globalization, here some of them will be taken into consideration to explain the complexity that this phenomenon brings. Different is also the approaches used with globalization, sometimes positive, sometimes negative, and other times skeptical; but what is interesting to see is how all those perspectives are focus on the same topics. The main question about this process is about the entity of globalization, and if is it a new order, just a myth or a necessary process? The common aim of those authors is the understanding of this phenomenon and solving its definition by pointing out the important effects and changes brought with it. The aim of this work is to give a wide perspective of the spheres touched by globalization, which are a lot, and to focus on its economic, socio- technologic, cultural and political dimension, by analyzing the role of the nation-state, which is one of the most discussed themes inside globalization’s theory and especially the changing function or not that it brings in the new era.
Keywords
- Appadurai, Arjun. (1996). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. M. Featherstone içinde, Nationalism, globalization and modernity (s. 295-310). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Avgerou , Chrisanthi;. (2002). Information systems and global diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Axtmann, R. (2004). The Nation-State and Globalization: Changing Roles and Functions. Les États nations et la globalisation: Roles et fonctions en mutation. International Political Science Review / Revue internationale de science politique, 259-279.
- Barker, E. (1962). The Politics of Aristotle . Oxford: Oxford Press Univeristy.
- Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization. The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Beck, U. (2003). La società cosmopolita. Prospettive dell'epoca postnazionale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Edelman, M., & Haugerud , A. (2005). The anthropology of development and globalization: from classical political economy to contemporary neoliberalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Eisenstadt, S. N. (1969). The political systems of empires. New York: Free Press. Fligstein, N. (1998). Is the globalization the cause of the crises of welfare states? Working Paper
- SPS (s. 98/5). Florence: European University Institute. Foucault, M. (2004). Nascita della biopolitica. Corso ald Collège de France (1978
- Milano: Feltrinelli. Friedman, T. L. (1999). The lexus and the olive tree. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and last man. New York: Free Press. Giddens , A., & Sutton, P. W. (2001). Fondamenti di sociologia. Bologna: Il Mulino. Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Giddens, A. (2005). The Globalization of Modernity. D. Held, & A. McGrew içinde, The Global Transformations Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (s. 6066). Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Ocford: Oxford University Press. Held, D. (1989). Political Theory and The Modern State. Standford: standford
- Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldbatt, D., & Perraton, J. (2005). Rethinking globalization. D. Held, & A. McGrew içinde, The Global Transformations Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (s. 67-74). Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalisation in question. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (2005). Globalization- A necessary Myth? D. Held, & A. McGrew içinde, The Global Transformations Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (s. 98-105). Cambridge : Polity Press.
- Jackson, R. H., & James, A. (1993). States in a Changing World. Oxford: Clanderon Press.
- Kellner, D. (2002). Theorizing globalization. Sociological theory, 285-305.
- Keohane, R. O. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. London and New York: Routledge.
- Lacher, H. (2006). Beyond globalization. Capitalism, territoriality and the international realtions of modernity. New York: Routledge.
- Mayer, K. U. (2001). The paradox of global social change and national path dependencies. A. Woodward, & M. Kohli içinde, Inclusion and exclusion in European societies (s. 89100). New York: Routledge.
- Mills, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2005). Globalization and the early life course. A description of selected economic and demographic trends. B. &. al. içinde, Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (s. 1-24). London: Routledge.
- Modelski, G. (2005). Globalization. D. Held, & A. McGrew içinde, The Global Transformations Reader. An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (s. 55-59). Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Moore, W. E. (1963). Social chenge. Englewodd Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Narula, U. (2006). Handbook of communcation. Models, perpectives, strategies. New Dehli:
- Nash, K. (2010). Contemporary political sociology. Globalization, politics and power. Malden: Blackwell Publisher.
- O'Brien, R. (1992). Global financial integration. The end of geography. London: Chatman House/Printer.
- Osterhammel, J., & Petersson, N. P. (2015). Storia della globalizzazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
- Raab, M., Ruland, M., Schönberger, B., Blossfeld, H.-P., Hofäcker, D., Buchholz, S., & Schmelzer, P . (2008). GlobalIndex : A Sociological Approach to Globalization Measurement. International Sociology, 596-631.
- Ritzer, G. (2007). The globalization od of nothing. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London, Thousand Oaks,
- Rowe, W., & Schelling, V. (1991). Memory and Modernity. Popular culture in Latin America. London: Verso.
- Thompson, J. E., & Krasner, S. J. (1989). Global transactions and the consolidation of soveregnity. E. O. Czempiel, & J. N. Rosenau içinde, Global chenges and theoretical challenges. Approaches to world poliics for the 1990s. Lexington: Lexington Books.
- Tomlinson, J. (2001). Sentirsi a casa nel mondo. La cultura come bene globale. Milano: Feltrinelli.
- Welfens, P. J. (1999). Globalization of the economy, unemployement and innovation. Structural change, schumpetrian adjustment and new policy challenges. Heildelberg: Springer- V erlag.
- Williams, M. (1996). Rethinging Sovereignity. E. Kaufman, & G. Young içinde, Globalization: theory and practice (s. 109-122). London: Pinter.
