Author :
Abstract
İnternetin yaygınlaşmaya başlaması ile birlikte kullanıcı olarak özneleşen ve internet uzamında çevrimiçi faaliyetler gerçekleştiren aktörler gündelik yaşamın bir parçası haline gelmiştir. İnternetin tüketicisi olan bu kullanıcılar, dijital platform ve uygulamaların işbirlikçi üreticisi ve katılımcı sürecin bir parçasıdırlar. Web 2.0 platformlarının gereği olarak işbirlikçi tüketim eğilimleri sergileyen kullanıcıların ürettikleri içerikler ve çevrimiçi olarak internet uzamında geçirdikleri süre içerisinde bıraktıkları dijital izler, adına büyük veri denen metalaşmış bir ticari değere dönüşmüştür. Ticari olarak bir değere sahip olan dijital veri ise dijital platformların sahibi olan şirketlerin en önemli kâr kaynağıdır.
Tamamen zaman ve mekân tüketimi bağlamında değerlendirilebilecek olan kullanıcıların çevrimiçi faaliyetleri, yarattıkları artık-değer üzerinden bir çalışma pratiği niteliği kazanmaktadır. Bu yönüyle dijital platform ve uygulamaların kullanıcıları, üretketici, üretlanıcı ve hüner tüketicisi olarak maddi olmayan emek faaliyetleri yürüten emekçilerdir. Bu çalışmada işbirlikçi tüketme pratiklerinin büyük veri ile olan ilişkisi ve Web 2.0 platformlarında gerçekleşen dijital çalışma biçimleri belirlenmeye çalışılmakta ve belirlenen yeni çalışma biçimleri üzerinden gerçekleşen sömürü analiz edilmeye çalışılmaktadır.
Keywords
Abstract
As the internet has become common, actors, who become subjects as users and perform online activities in the internet space, have become a part of daily life. These users, who are consumers of the internet, are the collaborative producers of digital platforms and applications and they are also a part of the participatory process. As a requirement of Web 2.0 platforms, the content produced by users who exhibit collaborative consumption tendencies and the digital traces that they leave during the time they spend online in the internet space have transformed into a commodified commercial value called big data. Digital data, which has commercial value, is the most important source of profit for companies that own digital platforms.
The online activities of the users, which can be evaluated entirely in the context of time and space consumption, gain the quality of a working practice over the surplus value they create. In this respect, the users of digital platforms and applications are workers, who carry out intangible labor activities as prosumers, produsers, and craft consumers. In this study, the relationship of collaborative consuming practices with big data and the digital working styles that take place on Web 2.0 platforms are tried to be determined and the exploitation that takes place through the determined new working styles is tried to be analyzed.
Keywords
- Back, L. (2012). Live Sogiolgy: Social Research and Its Futures, The Sociological Rewiev, 60 (S1), 18-39.
- Benedikt, M. (1991). Introduction, Cyberspace: First Steps, (Edt. M. Benedikt), Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Boyd, D. ve Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data, Information, Cominication and Society, 15 (5), 662-679.
- Bruns, A. (2016). Prosumption, Produsage, The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, (Ed. K.B. Jensen ve R.T. Craig) London: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond, New York: Peter Lang Pub.
- Campbell, C. (2005). The Craft Consumer: Culture, Craft and Consumption in Postmodern Society, Journal of Consumer Culture, 5 (1), 23-42.
- Castells, M. (2016). İletişim Gücü, (E. Kılıç), İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
- Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of The Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Crang, M., Crang, P. ve May, J. (1999). Virtual Geographies-Bodies, space and Relations, London: Routledge.
- Dreyfus, H. L. (2016). İnternet Üzerine, (Çev. V.M. Demir), İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
- Dyer-Witheford, N. (2019). Siber Proleterya Dijital Girdapta Küresel Emek, (Çev. E. Akçay), İstanbul: Z Yayınları.
- Dyer-Witheford, N. (2004). Siber M@rx Yüksek Teknoloji Çağında Sınıf Mücadelesi, (Çev. A. Çakıroğlu), İstanbul: Aykırı Yayıncılık.
- Fabrikant, S.I. ve Buttenfield, B. (2001). Formalizing Semantic Spaces for Information Access, Annals the Association of American Geographers, 91 (2), 263-280.
- Ferreira, D. ve Vale, M. (2021). From Cyberspace to Cyberspatialities?, Fennia, 199 (1) 1-6.
- Fuchs, C. ve Chandler, D. (2019). Introduction, Digital Objects, Digital Subjects: Interdiciplinary Perspectives on Capitalism, Labour and Politics in the age of Big Data, ( Edt. D. Chandler ve C. Fuchs), London: University of Westminster Press, 1-20.
- Fuchs, C. (2015). Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media, New York: Routledge.
- Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Prosumption Labour on Social Media in the Context of the capitalist Regime of the Time, Time&Society, 23 (1), 97-123.
- Fuchs, C. (2012). Google Capitalism, tripleC, 10 (1), 42-48.
- Fuchs, C. (2011). Web 2.0, Prosumption and Surveillance, Surveillance&Society, 8 (3), 288- 309.
- Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer, London: Harper and Collins.
- Graham, S. ve Marwin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism, Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, London: Routledge.
- Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space, Cambridge:
- Hall, P. ve Preston, P. (1988). The Carrier Wave: New Information technology and the Geography of Innovation, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
- Hardt. M. ve Negri, A. (2008). İmparatorluk, (Çev. A. Yılmaz), Altıncı Basım, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
- Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The Cultural Industries, Third Edition, London: Sage Pub.
- Kara, T. (2013). Sosyal Medya Endüstrisi İnsan, Toplum, Ekonomi, İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
- Kenney, M. ve Zysman, J. (2020). The Platform Economy Restructing the Space of Capitalist Accumulation, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13, 55-76.
- Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial Labor, (Çev. P. Colilli ve E. Emory), Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, (Edt. P. Virno ve M. Hardt), Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
- Mosco, V. ve McKercher, C. (2009). The Laboring of Communication: Will Knowledge Workers of the World Unite?, Lanham: Lexington Books.
- Negri, A. (1989) The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto fort he Twenty-First Century, MA: Polity Press.
- Nieborg, D. B. ve Poell, T. (2018). The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity, new media and society, 20 (11), 4275-4292.
- Perren, R. ve Grauerholz, L. (2015). Collaborative Consumption, International Encyclopedia of the Social Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition, 4, 139-144.
- Preston, P. (2001). Reshaping Communications: Technology, Information and Social Change, London: Sage Pub.
- Pybus, J. (2013). Sosyal Networks and Cultural Workers, Journal of Cultural Economy, 6 (2), 137-152.
- Ritzer, G., Dean, P. ve Jurgenson, N. (2012). The Coming of Age of the Prosumer, American Behavioral Scientist, 56 (4), 379-398.
- Ritzer, G. ve Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption, Journal of Consumer Culture, 10 (1), 13-36.
- Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods, Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Ryan, J. (2019). İnternetin Geçmişi ve Dijital Gelecek, (Çev. B. Keleş), Ankara: Tübitak Popüler Bilim Kitapları.
- Terranova, T. (2004). Network Culture Politics fort he Information Age, London: Pluto Press.
- Vaidhyanatan, S. (2011). The Googlization of Everything (and Why We Should Worry), Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wilkie, R. (2011). The Digital Condition Class and Culture in the Information Network, New York: Fordham University Press.
