THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS” “İBRAHİMÎ DİNLER” KAVRAMSALLAŞTIRMASININ MEŞRUİYETİNE DAİR İLERİ SÜRÜLEN FENOMENOLOJİK TEMELLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Some phenomenological-based claims about the conceptualization of "Abrahamic religions" are being put forward by those who advocate its legitimacy and authenticity. The "theological similarities" between Judaism, Christianity and Islam, believed to have originated from Abraham, constitute the first of the phenonemic basic claims. The second allegation of similarity is the “common story” and “common ancestor”, which is claimed based on the present historical story of Abraham in three religions. The center of the claim of theological similarity is constitute to the claim that three religions believe in the same God. It is understood that this alleged similarity to God provides a justification for associating the three religions with “Abraham”and describing as “Abrahamic”. When evaluated from the standpoint of phenomenological criteria, the conceptualization of "Abrahamic religions" and the use of this conceptualization in the academic framework are extremely problematic.
@article{2018,title={THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS”},abstractNode={Some phenomenological-based claims about the conceptualization of "Abrahamic religions" are being put forward by those who advocate its legitimacy and authenticity. The "theological similarities" between Judaism, Christianity and Islam, believed to have originated from Abraham, constitute the first of the phenonemic basic claims. The second allegation of similarity is the “common story” and “common ancestor”, which is claimed based on the present historical story of Abraham in three religions. The center of the claim of theological similarity is constitute to the claim that three religions believe in the same God. It is understood that this alleged similarity to God provides a justification for associating the three religions with “Abraham”and describing as “Abrahamic”. When evaluated from the standpoint of phenomenological criteria, the conceptualization of "Abrahamic religions" and the use of this conceptualization in the academic framework are extremely problematic.},author={Muhammet YEŞİLYURT},year={2018},journal={The Journal of Social Sciences}}
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT . 2018 . THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS” . The Journal of Social Sciences.DOI:10.16990/SOBIDER.4468
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT.(2018).THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS”.The Journal of Social Sciences
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT,"THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS”" , The Journal of Social Sciences (2018)
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT . 2018 . THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS” . The Journal of Social Sciences . 2018. DOI:10.16990/SOBIDER.4468
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT .THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS”. The Journal of Social Sciences (2018)
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT .THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS”. The Journal of Social Sciences (2018)
Format:
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT. (2018) .THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS” The Journal of Social Sciences
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT . THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS” . The Journal of Social Sciences . 2018 doi:10.16990/SOBIDER.4468
Muhammet YEŞİLYURT."THE EVALUATION OF THE ALLEGED PHENOMENOLOGICAL BASICS ABOUT THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF “ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS”",The Journal of Social Sciences(2018)