The art / politics bond, which has come to the fore in many different ways since the day of art, gave rise to a more meaningful discussion especially after the autonomy of art, with its ontology of importance and its distance from external influence. Accordingly, it is seen that a new aesthetic and even aesthetic regime is defined. The production of different codes of autonomy, defined in the axis of class conflicts, associated with avant-garde movements, produced various views on aesthetics and art / politics debates. Although it is inevitable that the self-contained space of art, defined as the aesthetic regime, will be differentiated from the interaction between art and life, the question of whether art itself or social organizations and power structures are decisive is the question of autonomy and the reading of art life together. clarifies. This study aims to examine the transformation of the aesthetic regime to the present by examining the ways in which art / politics based transformation is put forward by different views.